Sportac P60 Triple Drop-ins

Review: Sportac P60 Triple Drop-In Modules


Since their introduction a few months ago, the triple-emitter Sportac LED drop-in modules for SureFire hosts have been very popular with enthusiasts looking to boost the output from their P60 SureFire lights.  Featuring all brass heatsink construction, the Sportac triples provide a single output level and are available with a choice of emitters, either Cree XP-G2 S2 Cool White or Nichia 219 High CRI (Color Rendering Index) LEDs.

Sportac also manufactures drop-ins with a heatsink sized for the common 18650 P60 hosts from manufacturers other than SureFire.  Those 18650 P60 drop-ins will not fit SureFire lights due to the heatsink being squared and not tapered at the bottom.

This review will focus on the Cool White XP-G2 and High CRI Nichia 210 triples for SureFire hosts.  Both drop-ins retail for less than $40. 

Sportac Triple Drop-Ins – Overview

The triple drop-ins arrive packaged in small plastic containers similar to 35mm film canisters.  Inside the canisters, each drop-in was sealed in a plastic bag and cushioned by a small piece of foam.  It was interesting to note that both canisters had the same label, showing the specifications of the XP-G2 version, with the only difference being an added sticker applied to the Nichia 219 container.

Sportac P60 Triple drop-ins

Both drop-ins use the same Bicom 20.1mm lenses and are visually identical aside from the different emitters.

Sportac P60 triple drop-ins

The threaded aluminum retaining ring may be unscrewed allowing the lens to be removed.

Sportac P60 triple drop-ins

The drop-in has a short spring capped with a brass “button” with a nylon insulator around its edges.  The brass contact surface is slightly recessed but worked fine with all but one of my AW flat-top rechargeable cells.

Sportac P60 triple drop-ins

The triples were test-fitted into a variety of SureFire hosts with no issues.  With a couple of older hosts, the drop-in caused a barely noticeable gap between the Z44 bezel and flashlight body but this did not affect operation or the integrity of the light.  The drop-ins fit well but are not snug and will likely require wrapping with copper tape to maximize heat transfer to the flashlight body.

Sportac P60 triple drop-in in a SureFire Z3

Sportac Triple Drop-ins - Manufacturer's Specifications

 3 x Nichia 219 CRI-92 5000K3 x Cree XP-G2 S2 Cool White
LED Lumens9001224
ANSI FL-1 Lumens676925
Lux @ 1 meter21004200
Beam Distance100 yards (91.4m)141 yards (129m)
Spot Angle18°18°
Spill Angle90°90°
Runtime (2xCR123A).8 hours.8 hours
Runtime (3xCR123A)1.1 hours1.1 hours
Voltage Range2.7V - 9V2.7V - 9V
Weight1.3 ounces (36g)1.3 ounces (36g)


Sportac Triple Drop-Ins – Performance

By their very nature, most P60 triples have very floody beams and the Sportac triples are no exception.  The XP-G2 version has a large hotspot when illuminating a nearby surface while the Nichia triple is slightly more diffused.  As expected, the XP-G2 triple is noticeably more powerful while the Nichia is slightly warmer and provides better color rendition.

The following slides compare the Sportac triples against a variety of other lights to provide perspective of their output and beam profile.  The beamshots can be compared across the full width of the image using the slider and additional images can be accessed by using the navigation buttons in the bottom-right corner of each image.

In addition to the Sportac triples, the following lights are used in the comparison:

  1. SureFire P2X Fury (link to review)
  2. Mac’s Customs Triple XP-G Neutral
  3. Malkoff M91A Cool White
  4. Malkoff Wildcat V4 Cool White (link to review)
  5. TorchLab Triple XP-G2 Neutral (link to review)
  6. Malkoff Wildcat V5 (link to review)

Beamshots – 30 Yards to Swing

Beamshots – 40 Yards to Swing

Beamshots – 5 Yards to Building

The following beamshots are not indicative of actual light output as they were slightly underexposed to highlight the center hotspot of each beam.

Sportac Triple Drop-Ins – Runtime

The broad voltage range of the Sportac triples allows them to operate with a wide variety of battery configurations comprised of 1 or 2 lithium-ion rechargeable batteries or 2 to 3 lithium primary cells.  Runtime tests were conducted with each triple using the following battery combinations:

  1. 2 x Battery Station 123A
  2. 3 x Battery Station 123A
  3. 1 x AW 18650 3100 mAh
  4. 2 x AW 18650 3100 mAh

Sportac P60 triple drop-ins

The 123A batteries used in these tests were provided by the fine folks at The Battery Station.  Without their great support, this level of testing would not be possible.

An OVEREADY bored SureFire C2 was used as the host for these tests and was equipped with a Cryos Z44 Cooling Bezel and body extensions for the different battery combinations.  A cooling fan was used for all tests.

Sportac P60 Triple runtime

The XP-G2 triple produced consistent output levels across the various battery configurations and demonstrated stable regulation when powered by two lithium-ion cells.  With a single AW 18650 3100 mAh lithium-ion battery, the XP-G2 triple remained in regulation for approximately 15 minutes before beginning a long decline in output.

Regulated runtime with lithium primary batteries was just under 10 minutes for 2 x 123A batteries and approximately 40 minutes with three cells.  After dropping out of regulation, output falls abruptly to about 30% of the initial output and then slowly recovers to 60% over the next 30-45 minutes.  This peak is followed by a long decline as the batteries are depleted.

Sportac P60 Triple runtime

Output levels were very consistent with the Nichia triple as well, with only slight difference in runtimes when compared to the XP-G2 version.

Both triples are capable of producing substantial heat when operated continuously for prolonged periods of time.

Sportac Triple Drop-Ins – Conclusions

I was just a little bit skeptical of the Sportac triples when they were first announced.  It wasn’t that I didn’t believe they would work as advertised, but rather I wasn’t too sure how useful such a powerful drop-in would be without at least one lower output mode.  Now that I have used them both for a while, I have begun to change my stance as their broad floody beams are much less overwhelming than the output numbers would make them seem.  Still, 600-900 lumens are too much for some tasks but both drop-ins are very effective in open spaces.

Both drop-ins have received several hours of use without issue.  Runtime, when considering the output, is very respectable and the drop-ins have excellent regulation when powered by two lithium-ion rechargeable batteries.  Primary 123A batteries also work well although they are not up to the task of powering the triples for extended lengths of time.

The triples appear to be well constructed and solid although they seemed very slightly undersized in all of the SureFire hosts I tried them with.  This is not particularly unusual with P60 drop-ins but I was a little surprised they did not fit more snugly since these were made specifically for SureFire hosts.  This is more of a curiosity than an issue as the situation is easily remedied with a small amount of copper tape, as with many other types of P60 drop-ins.

Sportac P60 triple drop-in in SureFire 6P

The Sportac triples have performed well and there is no doubt they represent a nice value for anyone looking to upgrade an old P60 SureFire with a single-mode floody drop-in.


  • Solid regulation when powered by two lithium-ion batteries
  • Wide 2.7V-9V operating range allows battery flexibility
  • Affordable price
  • Selection of beam tints


  • Less versatile than some other drop-ins due to having only one output mode
  • Beam is very floody and does not have very much reach (may be a strength to some users)

Follow FlashlightGuide on Facebook and Twitter to stay up to date on the latest flashlight news, reviews and information.  Additional details about the P60 triple drop-ins can be found on the Sportac website.




Posted in Flashlight Accessories, Flashlight Reviews and tagged , , .


  1. Interesting Review, my drop-in is installed on my 6P Oveready, Sportac should make a model with two or three modes.

    To be continued….

    • After trying the single mode I liked it better than I expected but, I agree, an option for a 2 or 3 mode drop-in would be very nice. Thanks for stopping by!

      • I finally got my hands on the single XM-L2 and XP-G2 Sportac drop-in and I was able to run them in a Malkoff MD2 head with a hi/low ring installed. This allows for a low (~90 lumens) mode with extended run-time, especially on a 2×18650 MD4 body.

        Also worth noting: these drop-ins will run direct drive when powered by 2x AA. I’m currently on hour 30 of burn-time test of the XM-L2 drop-in using 2000mah eneloop cells and it’s still going. Initially, the AA cell high was around the same level of the low on an 18650 (I’d guess ~70 lumens, it was slightly less intense than my M61LL) but stepped down between hours 4 and 6 to a much lower level, I’d guess 30-40 lumens. It’s been there ever since. I’m guessing the voltage of the AA’s dropped below the 2.7 minimum for the driver after those first few hours. The low mode still works and is a nice 1 or 2 lumen moonlight mode at this point. I’ll keep you posted with final results and potentially do a burn-time test for the XP-G2 on AA’s as well.

        • Great information and thank you for sharing. It may be useful to others.

          I had read of some people using the Malkoff bodies but I haven’t tried it yet myself. Their use definitely opens up a lot of possibilities with the High/Low ring and the various body lengths for different batteries.

  2. I’m impressed with both. I have the Malkoff M91A and the 219 Nichia SHO in a 6P body with a combat grip battery extender (3 primaries) that I use for Home Defense Handgun Training The Sportacs are definitely very floody but lack the trow of the Malkoffs, of course. But then again for a home defense handgun light these seem to be quite adequate.

  3. Would you be able to see if these drop ins will fit in an elzetta? Now that I know the high low in a malkoff works on these, I’d like to drop one in my bored out elzetta. Thanks!

    • Hi,

      I haven’t performed any long-term testing using the AW 17670 but I have used them for short periods of time with no issues. Several CandlePowerForum members have mentioned using them as well. If you haven’t done so already, I would recommend taking a look at the thread on CPF where you can see some discussion of this. Unfortunately it is a very long thread but you can use the search function to narrow things down a bit.

Share your thoughts!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.